Once Webroot killed the virus, the system asked to scan the computer to check if any other malware is left. Besides, as we tested it with our samples, Webroot blocked all threats even though it didn’t kill them right away.Īs the malware was launched, the antivirus reported about the threat and proposed to remove it. Going through reviews, it is evident that customers are more than satisfied with the antivirus. ![]() Since we couldn’t fully rely on tests when evaluating Webroot’s effectiveness, we turned to users to check their experience. As a result, the test has shown that the antivirus didn’t miss any threats both during Full Spectrum and Ransomware evaluations. And the scores were more realistic – during the tests, the behavior blocking approach was considered. In the second quarter of 2018, this lab released a report where Webroot was included. The only lab whose tests made any sense is MRG Effitas. A more flexible pattern of scoring couldn’t understand the algorithm Webroot uses and thus, marked most attempts as a failure. But even though such an approach works perfectly well, classic tests take this as a fail.Įven the more sophisticated test by SE Labs didn’t succeed in evaluating this antivirus properly. If it is a threat indeed, the antivirus will remove it and discard the changes it managed to make. While Webroot watches over the suspicious program, the user stays protected. ![]() It further kills the process and blocks the sample only when the system confirms it is malware Instead of blocking the malware immediately, this antivirus allows the sample to run for a while and analyzes its behavior. Reliability and Securityĭue to the unusual way of detecting threats, it is hard for professional labs to test Webroot. But we are glad and ready to take this deal. Webroot is unbelievably generous with this rule. Moreover, if you change your mind, you have the full 70 days of the money-back guarantee. You can get a free trial for 14 days to figure out if you like this antivirus before buying.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |